VIJAY NATHALAL GOHIL vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA HOME DEPARTMENT — Crl.A. No. 42/2010

Case under Section II-A. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010187622009

Filing Date

03-Jul-2009

Registration No

Crl.A. No. 42/2010

Diary Number

18762/2009

Order Date

03-Sep-2019

Document Type

Judgement - of Main Case

Neutral Citation

2019 INSC 993

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section II-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VIJAY NATHALAL GOHIL

    Adv. ASHOK KUMAR SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA HOME DEPARTMENT

    Adv. NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 03-Sep-2019

    Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 03-Sep-2019

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Indira Banerjee and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjiv Khanna

  4. 26-Aug-2019

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 11-Aug-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 21-Apr-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 04-Jan-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 25-Nov-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 08-Oct-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 23-Jul-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 03-Jul-2009

    Case filed

    Registration No. Crl.A. No. 42/2010

  12. [ 2019 INSC 993 ]

    Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: Vijay Nathalal Gohil v. State of Maharashtra (Crl.A. 42/2010) The Supreme Court affirmed the life imprisonment conviction of Vijay Nathalal Gohil under Section 302 IPC for murdering his wife, dismissing his appeal. The postmortem revealed the death was caused by violent asphyxia through smothering, not suicide by poison as claimed; multiple ante-mortem injuries (nail marks on cheeks/throat, wrist injuries) evidenced struggle. The circumstantial evidence—appellant's presence at the scene, his false poison-bottle narrative to police, and family conflict—established guilt beyond reasonable doubt, with the chain of circumstances being complete and unbroken. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case