STATE TRADING CORP.OF INDIA LTD. vs M/S MAHESH AGRO P.LTD.. — Crl.A. No. 722/2014

Case under Section II-D. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010186202009

Filing Date

02-Jul-2009

Registration No

Crl.A. No. 722/2014

Diary Number

18620/2009

Order Date

01-Apr-2014

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Allowed

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section II-D

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE TRADING CORP.OF INDIA LTD.

    Adv. S. S. JAUHAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M/S MAHESH AGRO P.LTD..

    Adv. ASHWANI KUMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 14-Feb-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 03-Jan-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 25-Nov-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 12-Aug-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 19-Oct-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 23-Sep-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 26-Aug-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 13-Aug-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 23-Jul-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 03-May-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 22-Mar-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 19-Jan-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 25-Nov-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 13-Aug-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 02-Jul-2009

    Case filed

    Registration No. Crl.A. No. 722/2014

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State Trading Corp. of India Ltd. v. M/S Mahesh Agro P. Ltd. Outcome: The Supreme Court allowed State Trading Corp.'s appeals on April 1, 2014, setting aside the High Court's February 19, 2009 judgment that had quashed cheque bounce complaints (Nos. 837-838 of 2006 under Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138). The Court held that factual questions—whether cheques issued as security constitute "debt" and whether statutory presumptions apply—cannot be determined by High Court under Section 482 CrPC before trial evidence. Next Steps: Matters remitted to trial court for decision on merits in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case