STATE TRADING CORP.OF INDIA LTD. vs M/S BISHAN SAROOP RAM KISHAN A.P.LTD — Crl.A. No. 723/2014

Case under Section II-D. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010186192009

Filing Date

02-Jul-2009

Registration No

Crl.A. No. 723/2014

Diary Number

18619/2009

Order Date

01-Apr-2014

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Allowed

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section II-D

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE TRADING CORP.OF INDIA LTD.

    Adv. S. S. JAUHAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M/S BISHAN SAROOP RAM KISHAN A.P.LTD

    Adv. ASHWANI KUMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 14-Feb-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 03-Jan-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 25-Nov-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 12-Aug-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 19-Oct-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 23-Sep-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 26-Aug-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 13-Aug-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 23-Jul-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 03-May-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 22-Mar-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 19-Jan-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 25-Nov-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 13-Aug-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 02-Jul-2009

    Case filed

    Registration No. Crl.A. No. 723/2014

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State Trading Corp. of India Ltd. v. M/S Bishan Saroop Ram Kishan A.P. Ltd. Crl.A. No. 723/2014 | Supreme Court of India | April 1, 2014 The Supreme Court allowed STC's appeals against the Delhi High Court's February 19, 2009 judgment that had quashed two cheque bounce complaints (under Negotiable Instruments Act §138). STC issued two undated cheques as security for a Rs. 150 crore transaction, which were dishonored with "payment stopped" notes. The High Court had quashed proceedings, holding the cheques were security, not debt discharge. The Supreme Court reversed this, finding questions of whether cheques constituted debt security are factual issues requiring trial evidence and cannot be decided under §482 CrPC. The court set aside the High Court's judgment and remitted the matters to the trial court for decision according to law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case