PRINCE AGGARWAL vs THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) — Crl.A. No. 2105/2026

Case under 1511Misc-criminal Law : Criminal Matters Other Than Covered by the Aforesaid Categories(slps Arising Out of Quashing Applications, Orders Framing Charge, Summoning Orders, Interim Orders in Criminal Matters, Withdrawal of Prosecution, Orders for Further Investigation/re-investigation Etc. Section II-D. Status: DISPOSED.

CNR: SCIN010185622026

DISPOSED

Filing Date

25-Mar-2026

Registration No

Crl.A. No. 2105/2026

Diary Number

18562/2026

Order Date

23-Apr-2026

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Leave Granted & Allowed

Data as of 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

1511MISC-Criminal Law : Criminal matters other than covered by the aforesaid categories(SLPs arising out of quashing applications, orders framing charge, summoning orders, interim orders in criminal matters, withdrawal of prosecution, orders for further investigation/re-investigation etc. Section II-D

Petitioner(s)

PRINCE AGGARWAL

Adv. TARUN BHATI

Respondent(s)

THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI)

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.V. VISWANATHAN and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NONGMEIKAPAM KOTISWAR SINGH

23-Apr-2026

Fixed Date by Court

21-Apr-2026

FRESH

Orders

View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: Crl.A. No. 002105/2026 - Prince Aggarwal v. The State Outcome: The Supreme Court allowed Prince Aggarwal's appeal and quashed FIR No. 0103/2023 (registered under Sections 186/353/34 IPC at Police Station Anand Vihar, Delhi) along with the filed chargesheet. The court also set aside the High Court of Delhi's previous order rejecting the FIR quashing petition. Key Facts: The FIR arose from a scuffle during property eviction execution. However, the complainant (court bailiff Hari Ram) executed a settlement agreement with appellants and later provided a statement to the District Judge clarifying he never intended to lodge an FIR and that the execution was peaceful. Additionally, sanction under Section 195 CrPC for Section 186 IPC charges was declined. Court's Reasoning: Finding the FIR allegations vague, the settlement between parties genuine, and continued prosecution an abuse of process, the Supreme Court deemed it wasteful to let proceedings linger when the complainant had no grievance against appellants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Supreme Court of India All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case