M. STALISH S.M. JOSHI THERESH . vs THE CENTRAL COUNCIL OF INDIAN MED.. — SLP(C) No. 12258/2006

Case under Section XII-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010184862006

Filing Date

24-Jul-2006

Registration No

SLP(C) No. 12258/2006

Diary Number

18486/2006

Order Date

10-Mar-2014

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Disposed Off

Last updated 30-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XII-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M. STALISH S.M. JOSHI THERESH .

    Adv. ROMY CHACKO (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE CENTRAL COUNCIL OF INDIAN MED..

    Adv. B. BALAJI (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 03-Mar-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 06-Sep-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 24-Jul-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 16-Apr-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 12-Mar-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 13-Feb-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 23-Jan-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 24-Oct-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 07-Sep-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 14-Aug-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 07-Aug-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 07-Aug-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 07-May-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 31-Jul-2006
  17. 24-Jul-2006

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(C) No. 12258/2006

  18. 19-Jan-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 05-Dec-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of SLP(C) No. 012258/2006 This case was consolidated with multiple SLPs challenging the Madras High Court's dismissal of writ petitions filed by students admitted to Indian medicine courses in 2004-2005. On 10/03/2014, the Supreme Court disposed of the petitions with a direction to the University/Authorities to grant degree/certificates to petitioners (whether they passed or failed) within four weeks, as students had likely completed their courses but lacked formal credentials. All substantive contentions were left open for future litigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case