RANJAN SINHA . vs AJAY KUMAR VISHWAKARMA . — C.A. No. 8121/2004

Case under Section XVII-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010184502003

Filing Date

04-Sep-2003

Registration No

C.A. No. 8121/2004

Diary Number

18450/2003

Order Date

03-Jul-2017

Document Type

Judgement - of Main Case

Neutral Citation

2017 INSC 575

Disposal Type

Disposed Off

Last updated 29-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XVII-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RANJAN SINHA .

    Adv. ARPUTHAM ARUNA AND CO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AJAY KUMAR VISHWAKARMA .

    Adv. VARINDER KUMAR SHARMA RATAN KUMAR CHOUDHURI C. D. SINGH (Dead / Retired / Elevated) BINA GUPTA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 03-Jul-2017

    Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 03-Jul-2017

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice N.V. Ramana

  4. 02-Feb-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 02-Feb-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 12-Jan-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 12-Jan-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 11-Jan-2017

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 11-Jan-2017

    Office ReportView PDF

  10. 01-Dec-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 01-Dec-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 28-Sep-2016

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 26-Feb-2009
  14. 23-Jan-2009
  15. 10-Dec-2008
  16. 14-Nov-2008
  17. 17-Oct-2008
  18. 13-Aug-2008
  19. 10-Dec-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 05-Nov-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 08-Oct-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  22. 06-Aug-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  23. 16-Jul-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  24. 04-Sep-2003

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 8121/2004

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: Ranjan Sinha v. Ajay Kumar Vishwakarma (C.A. No. 008121/2004) Court's Decision: The Supreme Court held that newly formed states created through reorganization inherit the First Register of pharmacists prepared by their parent states. Jharkhand cannot prepare a new First Register under Section 30 of the Pharmacy Act; instead, the existing Bihar register—bifurcated by territorial residence—serves as Jharkhand's First Register. Future registrations must comply with Education Regulations prescribed by the Pharmacy Council of India, not the looser qualifications under Section 31. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case