DEFENCE ESTATE OFFICER vs LALITHA MOTA NAIK . — C.A. No. 331/2009

Case under Section XII-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010184442007

Filing Date

06-Jul-2007

Registration No

C.A. No. 331/2009

Diary Number

18444/2007

Order Date

11-Feb-2013

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 30-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XII-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DEFENCE ESTATE OFFICER

    Adv. DEVENDRA SINGH MEHRA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.LALITHA MOTA NAIK .

    Adv. RAUF RAHIM (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Feb-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 13-Sep-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 20-Jul-2012
  5. 06-Jul-2012
  6. 26-Apr-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 20-Apr-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 26-Mar-2012
  9. 23-Feb-2012
  10. 03-Feb-2012
  11. 09-Jan-2012
  12. 04-Jan-2012
  13. 12-Dec-2011
  14. 14-Oct-2011
  15. 12-Oct-2011
  16. 12-Sep-2011
  17. 18-Aug-2011
  18. 18-Jul-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 10-May-2011
  20. 10-May-2011
  21. 25-Apr-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  22. 15-Mar-2011
  23. 09-Mar-2011
  24. 28-Feb-2011
  25. 03-Feb-2011
  26. 06-Sep-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  27. 10-Aug-2010
  28. 06-Jul-2010
  29. 04-May-2010
  30. 06-Apr-2010
  31. 01-Apr-2010
  32. 15-Mar-2010
  33. 15-Feb-2010
  34. 26-Nov-2009
  35. 03-Nov-2009
  36. 08-Oct-2009
  37. 06-Oct-2009
  38. 04-Sep-2009
  39. 26-Aug-2009
  40. 13-Aug-2009
  41. 11-Aug-2009
  42. 07-Aug-2009
  43. 04-Aug-2009
  44. 21-Jul-2009
  45. 20-Jul-2009
  46. 17-Jul-2009
  47. 16-Jul-2009
  48. 13-Jul-2009
  49. 08-Jul-2009
  50. 15-May-2009
  51. 08-May-2009
  52. 08-May-2009
  53. 08-May-2009
  54. 01-May-2009
  55. 29-Apr-2009
  56. 22-Apr-2009
  57. 21-Apr-2009
  58. 21-Apr-2009
  59. 20-Apr-2009
  60. 08-Apr-2009
  61. 30-Mar-2009
  62. 19-Mar-2009
  63. 27-Feb-2009
  64. 24-Feb-2009
  65. 17-Feb-2009
  66. 06-Feb-2009
  67. 28-Jan-2009
  68. 15-Jan-2009
  69. 12-Jan-2009
  70. 06-Jan-2009
  71. 05-Jan-2009
  72. 08-Dec-2008
  73. 07-Nov-2008
  74. 05-Nov-2008
  75. 04-Nov-2008
  76. 24-Oct-2008
  77. 16-Oct-2008
  78. 03-Oct-2008
  79. 19-Sep-2008
  80. 15-Sep-2008
  81. 03-Sep-2008
  82. 29-Aug-2008
  83. 22-Aug-2008
  84. 18-Aug-2008
  85. 06-Aug-2008
  86. 01-Aug-2008
  87. 01-Aug-2008
  88. 30-Jul-2008
  89. 30-Jul-2008
  90. 30-Jul-2008
  91. 30-Jul-2008
  92. 22-Jul-2008
  93. 08-Jul-2008
  94. 07-Jul-2008
  95. 14-May-2008
  96. 14-May-2008
  97. 12-May-2008
  98. 09-May-2008
  99. 01-May-2008
  100. 21-Apr-2008
  101. 16-Apr-2008
  102. 09-Apr-2008
  103. 09-Apr-2008
  104. 07-Apr-2008
  105. 26-Mar-2008
  106. 03-Mar-2008
  107. 21-Feb-2008
  108. 13-Feb-2008
  109. 08-Feb-2008
  110. 07-Feb-2008
  111. 31-Jan-2008
  112. 25-Jan-2008
  113. 15-Jan-2008
  114. 03-Jan-2008
  115. 07-Dec-2007
  116. 27-Nov-2007
  117. 26-Nov-2007
  118. 21-Sep-2007
  119. 27-Aug-2007
  120. 27-Jul-2007
  121. 06-Jul-2007

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 331/2009

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C.A. No. 000331/2009 Outcome: On 11 February 2013, the Supreme Court (Justices G.S. Singhvi and H.L. Gokhale) granted the Defence Estate Officer's application for extension of time to deposit enhanced compensation amounts. The Court extended the payment deadline by four months from the hearing date, in accordance with an earlier Court order dated 13 September 2012. Next Steps: The interim applications were disposed of following the extension grant. The Defence Estate Officer was required to deposit the enhanced compensation to claimants within the newly extended four-month period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case