KRUSHNA CHHAGAN GAIKAWAD vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — SLP(Crl) No. 9171/2026

Case under 1506Rb-criminal Law : Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, Protection of Civil Rights Act, 1955(Slps Arising Out of Regular Bail Applications, Suspension of Sentence) Section II-A. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010183212026

Filing Date

25-Mar-2026

Registration No

SLP(Crl) No. 9171/2026

Diary Number

18321/2026

Order Date

11-May-2026

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Delay Condoned and matter dismissed(including all pending Ias)

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

1506RB-Criminal Law : Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, Protection of Civil Rights Act, 1955(SLPs arising out of Regular Bail applications, suspension of sentence) Section II-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KRUSHNA CHHAGAN GAIKAWAD

    Adv. MANISH TIWARI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

    Adv. AADITYA ANIRUDDHA PANDE[R-1] AADITYA ANIRUDDHA PANDE[R-2]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 11-May-2026

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah and Hon'ble Mr. Justice R. Mahadevan

  4. 20-Apr-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 20-Apr-2026

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah and Hon'ble Mr. Justice R. Mahadevan

  6. 16-Apr-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 16-Apr-2026

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vijay Bishnoi

  8. 13-Apr-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 13-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 25-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(Crl) No. 9171/2026

View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Summary: SLP(Crl) No. 009171/2026 — Krushna Chhagan Gaikawad v. State of Maharashtra The Supreme Court dismissed petitioner Krushna Chhagan Gaikawad's bail petition on 11-05-2026. The Court acknowledged his three-year custody period as a mitigating factor but rejected bail after considering his track record: he allegedly committed the present offense (simple injury by blunt object) shortly after receiving bail in two earlier cases, indicating he is a habitual offender and gang member. All pending applications were disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case