LALLA MOTIA CHAUHAN (D) TH. LRS. . vs UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS SECRETARY — C.A. No. 1483/2006

Case under 3102_3Jj-land Laws, Agricultural Tenancy, Land Revenue : Three Judge Matter Section III. Status: DISPOSED.

CNR: SCIN010182722005

DISPOSED

Filing Date

24-Aug-2005

Registration No

C.A. No. 1483/2006

Diary Number

18272/2005

Order Date

24-Sep-2025

Document Type

Judgement - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Data as of 30-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

3102_3jj-Land Laws, Agricultural tenancy, Land Revenue : Three Judge Matter Section III

Petitioner(s)

LALLA MOTIA CHAUHAN (D) TH. LRS. .

Adv. SHIVAJI M. JADHAV

Respondent(s)

UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS SECRETARY

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPANKAR DATTA and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NONGMEIKAPAM KOTISWAR SINGH

24-Sep-2025

Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

22-Jul-2025

Fixed Date by Court

21-May-2025

Fixed Date by Court

19-May-2025

Fixed Date by Court

15-May-2025

Fixed Date by Court

Orders in this case

[ 2025 INSC 1145 ] Judgement - of Main Case
18-Nov-2014 Office Report
07-Mar-2014 ROP
30-Jul-2012 ROP
04-May-2012 ROP
13-Apr-2012 ROP
10-Apr-2012 ROP
10-Apr-2012 ROP
23-Mar-2012 ROP
19-Mar-2012 ROP
13-Jan-2012 ROP
09-Dec-2005 ROP

Common Record of Proceedings — heard with connected matters

Lead case: C.A. No. 1479/2006

View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: C.A. No. 001483 / 2006 - Divyangnakumari Harisinh Parmar v. Union of India The Supreme Court dismissed appeals challenging the rescission of land grants (Alvaras) in Dadra and Nagar Haveli. The Collector's 1974 order rescinding the grants for non-cultivation under Article 12 of the Organic Regulation (OA) was upheld. The Court rejected pleas of waiver, acquiescence, delay, impossibility, and condonation, holding that mandatory cultivation conditions cannot be waived as they serve public policy. The High Court's reversal of concurrent findings was justified under Section 100 CPC. The order was not vitiated by mala fides despite being passed just before the 1971 Land Reforms Regulation came into force. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Supreme Court of India All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case