STATE OF NCT OF DELHI DEPARTMENT OF HOME THROUGH SECRETARY vs SHAILESH KUMAR@GUDDU — Crl.A. No. 1724/2014
Case under Section II-D. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010177922012
Filing Date
18-May-2012
Registration No
Crl.A. No. 1724/2014
Diary Number
17792/2012
Order Date
11-Jul-2019
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 06-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.STATE OF NCT OF DELHI DEPARTMENT OF HOME THROUGH SECRETARY
Adv. B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]
Respondent(s)
-
1.SHAILESH KUMAR@GUDDU
Adv. VARINDER KUMAR SHARMA VARINDER KUMAR SHARMA[R-2] VARINDER KUMAR SHARMA[R-3]
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Jul-2019
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Jul-2019
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice N.V. Ramana, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohan M. Shantanagoudar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi
-
06-Jun-2019
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Jun-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Apr-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Apr-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Feb-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Feb-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Nov-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Nov-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Oct-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Oct-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Aug-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Aug-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Aug-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Sep-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Jan-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Dec-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Nov-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Sep-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Aug-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Jul-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-May-2012
Case filed
Registration No. Crl.A. No. 1724/2014
Case Summary: State of NCT of Delhi v. Shailesh Kumar@Guddu (Crl.A. No. 1724/2014) Outcome: The Supreme Court dismissed the State's appeal, upholding the High Court's acquittal of Shailesh Kumar and others. The Court found the High Court was correct in noting that motive was not established and there was no direct eye-witness evidence; only chance witnesses (P.W. Nos. 3 and 4) mentioned seeing the deceased with the accused, which was disbelieved by the High Court and was insufficient for conviction. Next Steps: The bail bonds executed by the accused-respondents stand discharged following dismissal of the appeal. (Decided: 11 July 2019) This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts