LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,LUCKNOW vs JITENDRA MOHAN — C.A. No. 2502/2011
Case under Section III-A. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010176252008
Filing Date
01-Jul-2008
Registration No
C.A. No. 2502/2011
Diary Number
17625/2008
Order Date
06-Aug-2019
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Disposed Off
Last updated 04-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,LUCKNOW
Adv. M. C. DHINGRA (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [P-1]
Respondent(s)
-
1.JITENDRA MOHAN
Adv. KRISHNANAND PANDEYA[R-1]
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-Aug-2019
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Aug-2019
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aniruddha Bose
-
16-Nov-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Nov-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Sep-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Sep-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Jul-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Jul-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Mar-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Feb-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Jan-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Oct-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Sep-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Sep-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Sep-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Aug-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Jul-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Jul-2008
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 2502/2011
Case Summary: Lucknow Development Authority v. Jitendra Mohan (C.A. No. 2502/2011) The Supreme Court allowed Lucknow Development Authority's appeal against the Allahabad High Court's order that had imposed Rs. 2 lakhs cost on the Authority for filing false affidavits and misleading the court. The Court set aside this cost imposition on the ground that no notice was issued to the Authority before making adverse comments and imposing exemplary costs, finding such procedural safeguard essential before such action. The Court declined to remand the matter given the considerable time elapsed, thereby providing complete relief to the appellant Authority. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts