UMESH PAHWA vs STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH COMMERCE INDUSTRIES AND EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY — C.A. No. 4802/2023

Case under Section III. Status: DISPOSED.

CNR: SCIN010174592016

DISPOSED

Filing Date

13-May-2016

Registration No

C.A. No. 4802/2023

Diary Number

17459/2016

Order Date

31-Jul-2023

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Leave Granted & Disposed off

Data as of 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Section III

Petitioner(s)

UMESH PAHWA

Adv. KARANJAWALA & CO.[P-1]

Respondent(s)

STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH COMMERCE INDUSTRIES AND EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY

Adv. K. KRISHNA KUMAR[R-7] SUNNY CHOUDHARY[R-1] SUNNY CHOUDHARY[R-2] SUNNY CHOUDHARY[R-3] SUNNY CHOUDHARY[R-4] SUNNY CHOUDHARY[R-5]

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPANKAR DATTA

31-Jul-2023

Fixed Date by Court

16-May-2023

Fixed Date by Court

18-Apr-2023

Fixed Date by Court

11-Apr-2023

Fixed Date by Court

21-Mar-2023

Administrative Order

Orders in this case

01-May-2017 ROP
01-May-2017 ROP
01-May-2017 ROP
01-May-2017 ROP
01-May-2017 ROP
01-May-2017 ROP
01-May-2017 ROP
01-May-2017 ROP
17-Apr-2017 ROP
17-Apr-2017 Office Report
17-Apr-2017 ROP
23-Jan-2017 ROP
23-Jan-2017 Office Report
23-Jan-2017 ROP
16-Jan-2017 ROP
16-Jan-2017 ROP
16-Jan-2017 Office Report
16-Jan-2017 Office Report
16-Jan-2017 ROP
16-Jan-2017 ROP
15-Nov-2016 ROP
15-Nov-2016 Office Report
15-Nov-2016 ROP
09-Sep-2016 ROP
09-Sep-2016 Office Report
09-Sep-2016 ROP
View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Summary: C.A. No. 004802/2023 (Umesh Pahwa v. State of Madhya Pradesh) The Supreme Court disposed of a batch of 34 civil appeals filed by landowners challenging land acquisition proceedings for the Betama-Pithampur Industrial Cluster in Madhya Pradesh. The State represented that it had decided to scrap the acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and would instead pursue acquisition under the M.P. Investment Region Development and Management Act, 2013, through mutual consent. The Court found the appeals infructuous and disposed them accordingly, permitting the state to proceed with fresh acquisition under the alternative statutory framework. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Supreme Court of India All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case