PRATIBHA vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — C.A. No. 10397/2010

Case under Section III. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010173402009

Filing Date

09-Jun-2009

Registration No

C.A. No. 10397/2010

Diary Number

17340/2009

Order Date

08-Mar-2022

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section III

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PRATIBHA

    Adv. P. N. PURI[P-1]

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

    Adv. SACHIN PATIL[R-1] SACHIN PATIL[R-2] SACHIN PATIL[R-3]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Mar-2022

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 08-Mar-2022

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.M. Sundresh

  4. 03-Mar-2022

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.M. Sundresh

  5. 19-Feb-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 23-Jul-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 23-Jul-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 13-May-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 13-Apr-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 13-Apr-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 10-Apr-2015

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 11-Nov-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 03-Dec-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 01-Oct-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 28-Jul-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 05-Apr-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 09-Feb-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 27-Jul-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 09-Jun-2009

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 10397/2010

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Pratibha v. The State of Maharashtra (C.A. No. 10397/2010) The Supreme Court dismissed Pratibha's appeal challenging her termination order dated June 3, 2005. The Court upheld the concurrent findings of the Tribunal and High Court, holding that termination during extended probation is not a punishable action requiring disciplinary procedures under Maharashtra Civil Services Rules, 1979. The Court found that the one-year probation extension itself indicated the employer's dissatisfaction with her performance, and termination was validly issued instead of confirmation. Final Order: Appeal dismissed on March 8, 2022. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case