AYODHYA @ SAKIT @ LALLU . vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH HOME DEPARTMENT STATION HOUSE OFFICER — Crl.A. No. 1175/2013

Case under 1511Ttf-criminal Law : Criminal Matters Other Than Covered by the Aforesaid Categories(cases Where Sentence of 2 Years to 5 Years Is Imposed.) Section II-E. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010173192012

Filing Date

15-May-2012

Registration No

Crl.A. No. 1175/2013

Diary Number

17319/2012

Order Date

04-Sep-2024

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Disposed Off

Last updated 06-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

1511TTF-Criminal Law : Criminal matters other than covered by the aforesaid categories(Cases where sentence of 2 years to 5 years is imposed.) Section II-E

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AYODHYA @ SAKIT @ LALLU .

    Adv. ANIL KUMAR GUPTA-II

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH HOME DEPARTMENT STATION HOUSE OFFICER

    Adv. MISHRA SAURABH (Dead / Retired / Elevated) MRINAL GOPAL ELKER[R-1]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-Sep-2024

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 04-Sep-2024

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Misra

  4. 15-Dec-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 15-Dec-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 28-Sep-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 28-Sep-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 31-Jul-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 31-Jul-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 29-Aug-2014

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 26-Jul-2013

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 26-Jul-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 10-Jan-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 05-Nov-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 21-Sep-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 09-Jul-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 15-May-2012

    Case filed

    Registration No. Crl.A. No. 1175/2013

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Crl.A. No. 001175/2013 The Supreme Court partially allowed the appeal of Ayodhya @ Sakit @ Lallu and Durga Prasad against their 2012 High Court conviction. While maintaining their convictions under IPC Sections 307/34 and 324/34, the Court reduced their sentences to time already served (8.5 months and 3 months respectively) citing mitigating circumstances and the incident's occurrence in 2000. The appeal was abated regarding co-appellant Jagdish, who had deceased. Bail bonds were discharged, and the matter was disposed on September 4, 2024. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case