REGIONAL MANAGER, R.S.R.T.C. vs GHANSHYAM SHARMA — C.A. No. 5104/2001

Case under Section XV. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010172402000

Filing Date

11-Oct-2000

Registration No

C.A. No. 5104/2001

Diary Number

17240/2000

Order Date

06-Aug-2001

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XV

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.REGIONAL MANAGER, R.S.R.T.C.

    Adv. SUSHIL KUMAR JAIN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GHANSHYAM SHARMA

    Adv. DEVENDRA SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Aug-2001

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 11-Oct-2000

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 5104/2001

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Regional Manager, R.S.R.T.C. v. Ghanshyam Sharma (2001) Outcome: The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the Division Bench's order, and restored the Single Judge's decision upholding the dismissal of respondent Ghanshyam Sharma from his position as a bus conductor. Facts: Sharma was employed as a conductor by R.S.R.T.C. and was dismissed after being found carrying 23½ passengers without issuing tickets. The Labour Court upheld the misconduct finding but directed reinstatement with continuity of service but without back wages. The High Court's Single Judge set aside this award, but the Division Bench reversed that decision. Reasoning: The Court held that conductors failing to issue tickets or collecting improper fares constitute dishonesty or gross negligence causing financial loss to the corporation. Since ticket-issuance is the conductor's primary duty, reinstatement instead of dismissal would be "misplaced sympathy." The Labour Court's discretion under Section 11(A) to modify punishment must be exercised judiciously and cannot override dismissal in such cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case