JHARKHAND RAJYA V.B.A.P.K.S.SAMITTEE vs SAHODAR PRASAD MAHTO . — SLP(C) No. 14773/2009
Case under Section XVII-B. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010171592009
Filing Date
05-Jun-2009
Registration No
SLP(C) No. 14773/2009
Diary Number
17159/2009
Order Date
04-Feb-2013
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Disposed Off
Last updated 04-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.JHARKHAND RAJYA V.B.A.P.K.S.SAMITTEE
Adv. AMBHOJ KUMAR SINHA
Respondent(s)
-
1.SAHODAR PRASAD MAHTO .
Adv. KRISHNANAND PANDEYA HIMANSHU SHEKHAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-Feb-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Dec-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
31-Oct-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Oct-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Aug-2012
ROPView PDF
-
13-Jul-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Apr-2011
ROPView PDF
-
11-Apr-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Mar-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Feb-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Oct-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Sep-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Aug-2010
ROPView PDF
-
19-Feb-2010
ROPView PDF
-
19-Feb-2010
ROPView PDF
-
01-Feb-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Jan-2010
ROPView PDF
-
14-Sep-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Aug-2009
ROPView PDF
-
15-Jun-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Jun-2009
Case filed
Registration No. SLP(C) No. 14773/2009
-
27-Jan-2009
ROPView PDF
-
11-Dec-2008
ROPView PDF
-
21-Nov-2008
ROPView PDF
-
04-Nov-2008
ROPView PDF
-
22-Sep-2008
ROPView PDF
-
25-Jul-2008
ROPView PDF
-
30-May-2008
ROPView PDF
-
15-May-2008
ROPView PDF
-
06-May-2008
ROPView PDF
-
26-Mar-2008
ROPView PDF
-
12-Dec-2007
ROPView PDF
-
24-Sep-2007
ROPView PDF
-
17-Sep-2007
ROPView PDF
-
07-Sep-2007
ROPView PDF
-
07-Sep-2007
ROPView PDF
On 04/02/2013, the Supreme Court disposed of the special leave petitions filed by Jharkhand Rajya V.B.A.P.K.S. Samittee challenging a High Court order. The State of Jharkhand and Jharkhand State Electricity Board agreed to implement the High Court's order in accordance with Sections 131-134 of the Electricity Act, 2003, and the petitioner accepted this course of action. The Court noted that the petitioner remained free to challenge any ultimate decision that deviated from these statutory provisions before the appropriate forum. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts