H.S.GOUTHAM vs RAMA MURTHY AND ANR. ETC. — C.A. No. 1844/2010
Case under Section XII-B. Status: DISPOSED.
CNR: SCIN010016772007
Filing Date
13-Jan-2007
Registration No
C.A. No. 1844/2010
Diary Number
1677/2007
Order Date
12-Feb-2021
Document Type
Judgement - of Main Case
Neutral Citation
2021 INSC 82
Disposal Type
Appeals Allowed
Data as of 03-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
H.S.GOUTHAM
Adv. BHARTI TYAGI[P-1]
Respondent(s)
RAMA MURTHY AND ANR. ETC.
Adv. P. R. RAMASESH[R-1] P. R. RAMASESH[R-2]
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH
Fixed Date by Court
Fixed Date by Court
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-Feb-2021 | Fixed Date by Court |
| 28-Jan-2021 | Fixed Date by Court |
| 19-Jan-2021 | Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week |
| 09-Dec-2020 | Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week |
| 03-Dec-2020 | Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week |
Orders
Summary of H.S. Goutham v. Rama Murthy (C.A. No. 001844/2010) The Supreme Court reversed the Karnataka High Court's decision that had set aside a 1995 consent decree on fraud grounds. The Court ruled that the defendants' unexplained 6-year delay in challenging the decree—after property was auctioned, sold, and registered to a third-party purchaser—coupled with failure to prove fraud at the executing court stage, rendered the High Court's reliance on a subsequently-obtained inquiry report improper and unjustifiable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts