RABINDRA KUMAR SHAW vs UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF DEFENCE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY — C.A. No. 4852/2011

Case under Section XVII. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010167682011

Filing Date

20-May-2011

Registration No

C.A. No. 4852/2011

Diary Number

16768/2011

Order Date

28-Aug-2019

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Neutral Citation

2019 INSC 972

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XVII

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RABINDRA KUMAR SHAW

    Adv. SANJAY KUMAR DUBEY[P-1]

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF DEFENCE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY

    Adv. B. V. BALARAM DAS (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [R-1]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 28-Aug-2019

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 28-Aug-2019

    Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 28-Aug-2019

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Hemant Gupta

  5. 22-Aug-2019

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 22-Aug-2019

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Hemant Gupta

  7. 21-Aug-2019

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 21-Aug-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 23-Jun-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 23-Jun-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 26-Mar-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 13-Aug-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 16-Aug-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 11-Jul-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 07-Jul-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 20-May-2011

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 4852/2011

  17. [ 2019 INSC 972 ]

    Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C.A. No. 4852/2011 On 28-08-2019, the Supreme Court bench comprising Justice L. Nageswara Rao and Justice Hemant Gupta pronounced judgment, dismissing Rabindra Kumar Shaw's appeal against the Union of India Ministry of Defence. The judgment was declared non-reportable. All pending applications, if any, were disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case