O. ARUMUGASAMY vs TR MILLS PRIVATE LIMITED — C.A. No. 4322/2026
Case under Company Law, Sick Industries Including Disinvestment : Company Law, Sick Industries Including Disinvestment Section XVII-B. Status: PENDING.
CNR: SCIN010166032026
Filing Date
17-Mar-2026
Registration No
C.A. No. 4322/2026
Diary Number
16603/2026
Order Date
27-Apr-2026
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Data as of 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
O. ARUMUGASAMY
Adv. VENKATARAMAN R.[P-1]
Respondent(s)
TR MILLS PRIVATE LIMITED
Adv. BALAJI SRINIVASAN[R-7] BALAJI SRINIVASAN[R-6] ANAND DILIP LANDGE[R-11] ANAND DILIP LANDGE[R-1] ANINDITA MITRA[R-18] ANINDITA MITRA[R-17] ANINDITA MITRA[R-16] ANINDITA MITRA[R-15] BALAJI SRINIVASAN[R-8]
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.B. PARDIWALA and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI
FRESH
FRESH
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-Apr-2026 | FRESH |
| 21-Apr-2026 | FRESH |
Orders
Case Summary: C.A. No. 4322/2026 On 27-04-2026, the Supreme Court heard the admission petition and stay application in O. Arumugasamy v. TR Mills Private Limited. The appellant's counsel argued that while mediation is acceptable, the High Court erred in dismissing Company Appeals solely on the basis of parties' agreement to mediate, leaving appellants without legal remedy if mediation fails. The Court issued notice returnable in two weeks with dasti service permitted, and directed that mediation proceed as directed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, Chennai in the interim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts