THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN STATE OF RAJASTHAN TR.SEC.EDU.DEPT. SECRETARY EDUCATION DEPARTMENT vs SHRI AGARWAL SHIKSHA SAMITI GENERAL SECRETARY — C.A. No. 1996/2012
Case under Section XV. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010160322010
Filing Date
14-May-2010
Registration No
C.A. No. 1996/2012
Diary Number
16032/2010
Order Date
11-Jan-2022
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Appeals Allowed
Last updated 05-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN STATE OF RAJASTHAN TR.SEC.EDU.DEPT. SECRETARY EDUCATION DEPARTMENT
Adv. RUCHI KOHLI (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Respondent(s)
-
1.SHRI AGARWAL SHIKSHA SAMITI GENERAL SECRETARY
Adv. SHOBHA GUPTA (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Jan-2022
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Jan-2022
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.M. Sundresh
-
04-May-2017
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Apr-2017
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Jul-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Jul-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-May-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Jul-2014
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Jul-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Feb-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Jan-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Dec-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Sep-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Jul-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-May-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Sep-2010
ROPView PDF
-
30-Aug-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Jul-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-May-2010
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 1996/2012
Case Summary: C.A. No. 001996/2012 Outcome: The Supreme Court allowed Rajasthan State's appeals on January 11, 2022, setting aside the lower court judgments. The Court ruled that Shri Agarwal Shiksha Samiti (an aided educational institution) is NOT entitled to 80% reimbursement of gratuity liabilities for a 10-year period when its employees were absorbed as government employees. Under the statutory scheme, the institution bears full gratuity liability regardless of grant-in-aid percentage. The Court left parties to bear their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts