THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT SECRETARY vs SUBHASH SONA — C.A. No. 853/2011
Case under Section III. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010159342010
Filing Date
13-May-2010
Registration No
C.A. No. 853/2011
Diary Number
15934/2010
Order Date
16-Feb-2023
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 05-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT SECRETARY
Adv. RAHUL KAUSHIK (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [P-1] [Gr]
Respondent(s)
-
1.SUBHASH SONA
Adv. M. C. DHINGRA (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [R-1]
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Feb-2023
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Feb-2023
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Hrishikesh Roy and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dipankar Datta
-
03-Feb-2020
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Feb-2020
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.R. Shah
-
20-Jan-2020
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Jan-2020
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.R. Shah
-
14-Oct-2019
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Oct-2019
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice R. Subhash Reddy
-
08-Apr-2019
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Apr-2019
Fixed Date by Court
Registrar (A-J)
-
05-Feb-2019
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Feb-2019
Fixed Date by Court
Registrar (A-J)
-
05-Dec-2018
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Dec-2018
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Feb-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Feb-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Jul-2014
ROPView PDF
-
20-Jul-2012
ROPView PDF
-
31-Oct-2011
ROPView PDF
-
31-Oct-2011
ROPView PDF
-
21-Oct-2011
ROPView PDF
-
13-Sep-2011
ROPView PDF
-
03-Aug-2011
ROPView PDF
-
02-Feb-2011
ROPView PDF
-
14-Jan-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Dec-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Nov-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Oct-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Aug-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Jul-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-May-2010
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 853/2011
Summary Civil Appeal No. 853/2011 was dismissed as infructuous by the Supreme Court on February 16, 2023. The State of Madhya Pradesh's counsel argued the appeal had become infructuous following the Court's earlier orders dated February 3, 2020, while the respondents' counsel submitted that the respondents had retired, making the matter not survivable for adjudication. The Court accepted both submissions and ordered the appeal closed, with all pending applications disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts