VINOD vs STATE OF M.P. — Crl.A. No. 1168/2010

Case under Section II-E. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010158732007

Filing Date

25-May-2007

Registration No

Crl.A. No. 1168/2010

Diary Number

15873/2007

Order Date

27-May-2014

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 29-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section II-E

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VINOD

    Adv. VISHNU SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF M.P.

    Adv. C. D. SINGH (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-May-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 23-May-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 15-Jan-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 14-Dec-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 22-Nov-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 05-Jul-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 30-Sep-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 09-Sep-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 23-Jul-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 08-May-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 14-Mar-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 06-Sep-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 24-Aug-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 13-Aug-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 11-Jun-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 01-Jun-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 25-May-2007

    Case filed

    Registration No. Crl.A. No. 1168/2010

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Vinod v. State of M.P., Crl.A. 1168/2010 The Supreme Court dismissed Vinod's appeal against his conviction for selling adulterated rice under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954. A food inspector found dead insects in rice samples from Vinod's shop in Shivpuri, Madhya Pradesh in 1990; the Public Analyst confirmed adulteration. Despite Vinod's argument that dead insects alone don't constitute "insect infestation," the Court upheld the conviction, finding the Public Analyst's report established adulteration under statutory standards and was unchallenged by cross-examination. Vinod was directed to surrender within six weeks to serve the remaining sentence of six months imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case