COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, COCHIN vs M/S GIRNAR INDUSTRIES, THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR — C.A. No. 351/2012

Case under Section XI-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010158592010

Filing Date

13-May-2010

Registration No

C.A. No. 351/2012

Diary Number

15859/2010

Order Date

20-Jul-2017

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XI-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, COCHIN

    Adv. ANIL KATIYAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M/S GIRNAR INDUSTRIES, THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR

    Adv. SHIV KUMAR SURI (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [R-1]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Sep-2018

    Vacation Matter

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.K. Sikri and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan

  3. 20-Jul-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 20-Jul-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 27-Apr-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 27-Apr-2017

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 27-Apr-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 29-Mar-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 29-Mar-2017

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 29-Mar-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 07-Mar-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 07-Mar-2017

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 07-Mar-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 09-Jan-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 02-Dec-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 22-Sep-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 21-Jul-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 06-Jul-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 13-May-2010

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 351/2012

casestatus.in Summary

On 20-07-2017, the Registrar heard C.A. No. 351/2012 (CIT, Central Cochin v. M/S Girnar Industries). Both parties filed the Statement of Case as required, and the matter was processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court. The related C.A. No. 380/2012 was also heard, but counsel failed to file the Statement of Case within the statutory period; it too was processed for listing before the Court under the rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case