ISMAIL @LUNGI @MAMA FAQIRMOHAMMAD SHAIKH (ISMAIL @LUNGI FAKIRMAHAMMAD SHAIKH) vs STATE OF GUJARAT — Crl.A. No. 2314/2026

Case under 1504Rb-criminal Law : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985(Slps Arising Out of Regular Bail Applications, Suspension of Sentence) Section II-E. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010158442026

Filing Date

14-Mar-2026

Registration No

Crl.A. No. 2314/2026

Diary Number

15844/2026

Order Date

04-May-2026

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Leave Granted & Allowed

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

1504RB-Criminal Law : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985(SLPs arising out of Regular Bail applications, suspension of sentence) Section II-E

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ISMAIL @LUNGI @MAMA FAQIRMOHAMMAD SHAIKH (ISMAIL @LUNGI FAKIRMAHAMMAD SHAIKH)

    Adv. RONAK KARANPURIA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. SWATI GHILDIYAL [R-1]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 04-May-2026

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dipankar Datta and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish Chandra Sharma

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 01-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 14-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. Crl.A. No. 2314/2026

View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Crl.A. No. 002314/2026 The Supreme Court allowed appellant Ismail's criminal appeal and set aside the Gujarat High Court's December 24, 2025 order rejecting his fifth bail application. Ismail, accused as A-2 in a narcotics case involving 391 bottles of codeine syrup (FIR registered August 4, 2023), was granted bail considering his secondary role and that co-accused A-1 and A-3 were already on bail. The court imposed standard bail conditions: furnishing bail bonds, diligent trial attendance, refraining from witness intimidation, with liberty to cancel bail for breaches. Trial is expected to take time as charges were framed February 7, 2026, with 15 witnesses yet to be examined. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case