NAYAK RAJESH SOBANI vs THE STATE OF ORISSA — SLP(Crl) No. 6255/2026

Case under 1511Cb-criminal Law : Criminal Matters Other Than Covered by the Aforesaid Categories(matters Filed for Cancellation of Bail/ Challenging Grant of Regular Bail or Anticipatory Bail) Section II-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010157462026

Filing Date

14-Mar-2026

Registration No

SLP(Crl) No. 6255/2026

Diary Number

15746/2026

Order Date

15-May-2026

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Disposed Off

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

1511CB-Criminal Law : Criminal matters other than covered by the aforesaid categories(Matters filed for cancellation of bail/ challenging grant of regular bail or anticipatory bail) Section II-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NAYAK RAJESH SOBANI

    Adv. ASHISH PANDEY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF ORISSA

    Adv. NIRANJAN SAHU[R-2] NIRANJAN SAHU[R-3] NIRANJAN SAHU[R-4] SRISATYA MOHANTY [R-1]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-May-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 15-May-2026

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.K. Maheshwari and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Atul S. Chandurkar

  4. 08-May-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 08-May-2026

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.K. Maheshwari and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Atul S. Chandurkar

  6. 06-Apr-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 06-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 14-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(Crl) No. 6255/2026

View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: NAYAK RAJESH SOBANI v. THE STATE OF ORISSA Outcome: The Supreme Court dismissed the petitioner's special leave petition and upheld the High Court of Orissa's order granting anticipatory bail to respondents 2-4. The Court found no grounds to interfere, noting the significant delay in lodging the FIR (from January 28 to December 27, 2025) and that respondent 4 was pregnant and undergoing treatment. Additional conditions were imposed: respondents must not intimidate the petitioner, must cooperate with investigation, and any breach permits either party to seek relief. Next Steps: The matter is disposed; case proceeds to trial in the lower court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case