GURMEET SINGH vs THE STATE OF PUNJAB HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARY — Crl.A. No. 1731/2010
Case under Section II-B. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010150162010
Filing Date
07-May-2010
Registration No
Crl.A. No. 1731/2010
Diary Number
15016/2010
Order Date
28-May-2021
Document Type
Judgement - of Main Case
Neutral Citation
2021 INSC 299
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 04-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GURMEET SINGH
Adv. RISHI MALHOTRA (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF PUNJAB HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARY
Adv. JASPREET GOGIA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
28-May-2021
Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-May-2021
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-May-2021
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble The Chief Justice, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Surya Kant and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aniruddha Bose
-
25-Feb-2021
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Feb-2021
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice N.V. Ramana, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Surya Kant and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aniruddha Bose
-
18-Feb-2021
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Feb-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Sep-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Sep-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Jul-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Sep-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Jul-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-May-2010
Case filed
Registration No. Crl.A. No. 1731/2010
-
[ 2021 INSC 299 ]
Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF
Summary: Gurmeet Singh v. State of Punjab (Crl.A. No. 001731/2010) The Supreme Court dismissed Gurmeet Singh's appeal against his conviction under Section 304-B IPC (dowry death), affirming the concurrent findings of the Trial and High Courts. The court found that the prosecution proved all essential ingredients: the deceased died by poison consumption within seven years of marriage under abnormal circumstances, and credible evidence established dowry demands and harassment in the months preceding her death. The appellant failed to rebut the statutory presumption under Section 113-B of the Evidence Act, including through his fabricated defense that hospital records proved cordial family relations—the court found he forged these records while in custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts