MD. ABDUL QADIR SIDDIQUE vs THE STATE OF ARUNACHAL PRADESH STATE OF ARUNACHAL PRADESH SECRETARY — C.A. No. 7446 - 7447/2011
Case under Section XIV-A. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010014982006
Filing Date
13-Jan-2006
Registration No
C.A. No. 7446 - 7447/2011
Diary Number
1498/2006
Order Date
04-Apr-2018
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 16-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MD. ABDUL QADIR SIDDIQUE
Adv. BHAGABATI PRASAD PADHY[P-1]
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF ARUNACHAL PRADESH STATE OF ARUNACHAL PRADESH SECRETARY
Adv. ANIL SHRIVASTAV[R-1]
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-Apr-2018
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Apr-2018
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohan M. Shantanagoudar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Navin Sinha
-
15-Feb-2018
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohan M. Shantanagoudar
-
08-Feb-2018
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohan M. Shantanagoudar
-
07-Feb-2018
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohan M. Shantanagoudar
-
01-Feb-2018
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohan M. Shantanagoudar
-
31-Jan-2018
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohan M. Shantanagoudar
-
24-Jan-2018
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohan M. Shantanagoudar
-
18-Jan-2018
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amitava Roy
-
17-Jan-2018
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amitava Roy
-
14-Dec-2017
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amitava Roy
-
13-Dec-2017
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amitava Roy
-
12-Dec-2017
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amitava Roy
-
07-Dec-2017
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amitava Roy
-
06-Dec-2017
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amitava Roy
-
30-Nov-2017
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amitava Roy
-
23-Nov-2017
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amitava Roy
-
05-Oct-2017
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph and Hon'ble Mrs. Justice R. Banumathi
-
24-Aug-2017
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph and Hon'ble Mrs. Justice R. Banumathi
-
17-Aug-2017
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph and Hon'ble Mrs. Justice R. Banumathi
-
16-Aug-2017
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-Jul-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Jul-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Feb-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Dec-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Aug-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Aug-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Apr-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Mar-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Mar-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Feb-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Jan-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Dec-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Nov-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Sep-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Aug-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Jul-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-May-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Apr-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Feb-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Oct-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Aug-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Jan-2006
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 7446 - 7447/2011
-
30-Jan-1006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
Summary of C.A. No. 7446-7447/2011 MD. Abdul Qadir Siddique v. State of Arunachal Pradesh The Supreme Court dismissed the appellant's appeals challenging the High Court's decision denying his absorption into the Arunachal Pradesh Energy Development Agency (APEDA) after completing five years on deputation. The Court upheld that deputation orders explicitly precluded automatic absorption rights and that the Screening Committee—headed by the Secretary instead of the Commissioner—was properly constituted. Finding no illegality, prejudice, or mala fides in the decision-making process, the Court held that borrowing departments retain discretion to assess suitability before absorption. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts