KAREGOWDA vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF PROSECUTION HOME SECRETARY — Crl.A. No. 338/2013
Case under 1511Li-criminal Law : Criminal Matters Other Than Covered by the Aforesaid Categories(cases Where Life Sentence Is Imposed) Section II-E. Status: Pending.
CNR: SCIN010014772013
Filing Date
11-Jan-2013
Registration No
Crl.A. No. 338/2013
Diary Number
1477/2013
Order Date
09-Jan-2025
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Last updated 04-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KAREGOWDA
Adv. ANIL KUMAR TANDALE (Dead / Retired / Elevated) G. SIVABALAMURUGAN[P-1]
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF PROSECUTION HOME SECRETARY
Adv. V. N. RAGHUPATHY
Case History
-
09-Jan-2025
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Jan-2025
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dipankar Datta and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manmohan
-
03-Nov-2022
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Nov-2022
After Week/Month/Vacation
Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.B. Pardiwala
-
16-Dec-2019
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Dec-2019
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi
-
02-Dec-2019
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Dec-2019
Fixed Date by Court
Registrar (J) - II
-
05-Aug-2019
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Aug-2019
Fixed Date by Court
Registrar (J) - II
-
23-Apr-2019
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Apr-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Feb-2014
ROPView PDF
-
12-Aug-2013
ROPView PDF
-
26-Apr-2013
ROPView PDF
-
22-Apr-2013
ROPView PDF
-
03-Apr-2013
ROPView PDF
-
15-Mar-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Mar-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Jan-2013
Case filed
Registration No. Crl.A. No. 338/2013
Summary of Crl.A. No. 338/2013 (Karegowda v. State of Karnataka) On 09-01-2025, the Supreme Court heard criminal appeals filed by Karegowda, Meenakumar, and Manjunath against the State of Karnataka. Since appellant Karegowda failed to appear despite notice, the court appointed Dr. G. Sivabalamurugan as amicus curiae to represent him. The court directed the other appellants to provide soft copies of case records to the amicus and State counsel, and re-listed the appeals for hearing after three weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts