RAMESH CHANDRA SAHNI vs THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH THR. COLLECTOR — C.A. No. 5269/2012

Case under Section III-A. Status: DISPOSED.

CNR: SCIN010147092006

DISPOSED

Filing Date

15-Jun-2006

Registration No

C.A. No. 5269/2012

Diary Number

14709/2006

Order Date

09-Aug-2017

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Data as of 29-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section III-A

Petitioner(s)

RAMESH CHANDRA SAHNI

Adv. SURYA KANT[P-1]

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH THR. COLLECTOR

Adv. VINAY GARG SHAKIL AHMED SYED (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [R-2] SHAKIL AHMED SYED (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [R-3] VINAY GARG[R-4] VINAY GARG[R-1]

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR

09-Aug-2017

Ordinary

Orders

View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Summary: Ramesh Chandra Sahni v. State of Uttar Pradesh (C.A. No. 005269/2012) Outcome: The Supreme Court dismissed appellant Ramesh Chandra Sahni's appeal on August 9, 2017. The Court upheld the High Court's decision validating the Lucknow Development Authority's land acquisition of the appellant's agricultural plots (totaling ~5.5 bighas) under urgency provisions of the Land Acquisition Act, 1874. Since possession was taken and an award passed in 1988 with compensation deposited, the Court rejected the appellant's argument that the acquisition lapsed due to non-payment of compensation. Key Holding: The Court held that when urgency provisions (Sections 17(1) and 17(4)) are invoked, the two-year payment deadline does not apply, and the acquisition remains valid despite the appellant's non-acceptance of compensation and continued objection to the acquisition itself. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Supreme Court of India All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case