NOOKALA KALAVATHAMMA . vs NOOKALA KASHINATHAM — C.A. No. 3059/2008

Case under Section XIV-A. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010014632006

Filing Date

13-Jan-2006

Registration No

C.A. No. 3059/2008

Diary Number

1463/2006

Order Date

10-Nov-2010

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Disposed Off

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XIV-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NOOKALA KALAVATHAMMA .

    Adv. V. N. RAGHUPATHY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NOOKALA KASHINATHAM

    Adv. ANJANI AIYAGARI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Nov-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 03-Aug-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 04-May-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 26-Apr-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 19-Mar-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 21-Apr-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 21-Apr-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 24-Mar-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 03-Mar-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 10-Oct-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 11-Sep-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 21-Nov-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 22-Aug-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 27-Jul-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 11-Jul-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 21-Apr-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 13-Jan-2006

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 3059/2008

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: On November 10, 2010, the Supreme Court heard Civil Appeal No. 3059 of 2008 between Nookala Kalavathamma & Another (appellants) and Nookala Kashinatham (respondent). The appellants' counsel was absent; only the respondent's counsel appeared. The court disposed of the appeal based on a settlement agreement reached through Bangalore Mediation Centre, with the Memorandum of Agreement signed by both parties and their counsel forming part of the court order. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case