PATIALA IMPROVEMENT TRUST, PATIALA vs HARSARUP . — SLP(C) No. 14102/2006

Case under Section IV-B. Status: DISPOSED.

CNR: SCIN010145382006

DISPOSED

Filing Date

12-Jun-2006

Registration No

SLP(C) No. 14102/2006

Diary Number

14538/2006

Order Date

17-Sep-2012

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Data as of 29-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section IV-B

Petitioner(s)

PATIALA IMPROVEMENT TRUST, PATIALA

Adv. T. N. SINGH

Respondent(s)

HARSARUP .

Adv. SHALU SHARMA

Orders

10-May-2012 ROP
29-Mar-2012 ROP
14-Feb-2012 ROP
10-Jan-2012 ROP
19-Oct-2011 ROP
13-Sep-2011 ROP
05-Aug-2011 ROP
06-Jul-2011 ROP
03-May-2011 ROP
11-Apr-2011 ROP
03-Jan-2011 ROP
30-Sep-2010 ROP
26-Feb-2009 ROP
14-Jan-2009 ROP
10-Dec-2008 ROP
19-Nov-2008 ROP
15-Oct-2008 ROP
27-Nov-2007 ROP
11-Oct-2007 ROP
14-Aug-2007 ROP
31-Jul-2006 ROP
View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY: SLP(C) No. 14102/2006 - Patiala Improvement Trust v. Harsarup The Supreme Court dismissed the Patiala Improvement Trust's special leave petition challenging the High Court's order upholding enhanced land compensation awarded by the Land Acquisition Tribunal. The Tribunal had fixed market value for 40.25 acres acquired for a Truck Stand Scheme at Rs.14, Rs.9, Rs.8, and Rs.7 per square yard across four blocks (versus the original Rs.6, Rs.5.30, Rs.5, and Rs.4.10), relying on comparable 1971 sale deeds and applying land appreciation principles. The Court held the High Court correctly granted enhanced compensation by referencing rates fixed for adjacent land acquired under the related "Shaheed Sewa Singh Thikriwala Nagar" scheme. The Court rejected the Trust's argument about applying development charge cuts, noting landowners deserved 10% annual escalation for the two-year gap. Landowners were directed to receive full compensation with statutory benefits within three months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Supreme Court of India All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case