YATINDER KUMAR AGGARWAL vs MUKUND SWARUP — CONMT.PET.(Crl.) No. 2/2012
Case under Section MENTIONING. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010142242012
Filing Date
23-Apr-2012
Registration No
CONMT.PET.(Crl.) No. 2/2012
Diary Number
14224/2012
Order Date
20-Feb-2019
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Neutral Citation
2019 INSC 67
Disposal Type
Disposed Off
Last updated 06-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.YATINDER KUMAR AGGARWAL
Adv. MOHD. IRSHAD HANIF
Respondent(s)
-
1.MUKUND SWARUP
Adv. DINESH KUMAR GARG MANOJ K. MISHRA[R-3] MANOJ K. MISHRA[R-4] ASHUTOSH GARG[R-2] C. K. RAI[R-5] C. K. RAI[R-6]
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
20-Feb-2019
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Jan-2019
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Jan-2019
Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Jan-2019
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.K. Sikri, Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Abdul Nazeer and Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.R. Shah
-
08-Jan-2019
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Dec-2018
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Mar-2018
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Mar-2018
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.K. Sikri and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan
-
10-Jan-2018
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Jan-2018
Not Taken Up
Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.K. Sikri and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan
-
08-Aug-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Jul-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Jul-2017
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Apr-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Apr-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Mar-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Mar-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Feb-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Feb-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Feb-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Feb-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Jan-2017
ROPView PDF
-
20-Jan-2017
ROPView PDF
-
13-Oct-2015
ROPView PDF
-
13-Oct-2015
ROPView PDF
-
04-Aug-2015
ROPView PDF
-
04-Aug-2015
ROPView PDF
-
09-Apr-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Feb-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Jul-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Apr-2012
Case filed
Registration No. CONMT.PET.(Crl.) No. 2/2012
-
[ 2019 INSC 67 ]
Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF
Case Summary In this contempt petition heard on 20-02-2019, the counsel for the contemnors (respondent) informed the Court that compensation in the form of a demand draft had been offered to the petitioner but was not accepted. The Supreme Court Court (Justices Sikri, Nazeer, and Shah) permitted the demand draft to be deposited with the Registry, allowing the other side to collect it whenever they wish. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts