NANDINI SUNDAR . vs STATE OF CHATTISGARH — W.P.(C) No. 250/2007

Case under 15P-criminal Law Section PIL-W. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010140302007

Filing Date

09-May-2007

Registration No

W.P.(C) No. 250/2007

Diary Number

14030/2007

Order Date

15-May-2025

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Disposed Off

Last updated 29-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

15P-Criminal Law Section PIL-W

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NANDINI SUNDAR .

    Adv. SUMITA HAZARIKA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHATTISGARH

    Adv. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA ANITHA SHENOY (Dead / Retired / Elevated) PRASHANT SINGH[R-1]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-May-2025

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 15-May-2025

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice B.V. Nagarathna and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish Chandra Sharma

  4. 06-May-2025

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 06-May-2025

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice B.V. Nagarathna and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish Chandra Sharma

  6. 25-Mar-2025

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 25-Mar-2025

    After Week/Month/Vacation

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice B.V. Nagarathna and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish Chandra Sharma

  8. 07-Jan-2025

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 07-Jan-2025

    After Week/Month/Vacation

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Hrishikesh Roy and Hon'ble Mr. Justice S.V.N. Bhatti

  10. 03-Dec-2024

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 03-Dec-2024

    After Week/Month/Vacation

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Hrishikesh Roy and Hon'ble Mr. Justice S.V.N. Bhatti

  12. 12-Nov-2024

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 12-Nov-2024

    After Week/Month/Vacation

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Hrishikesh Roy and Hon'ble Mr. Justice S.V.N. Bhatti

  14. 03-Sep-2024

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 03-Sep-2024

    After Week/Month/Vacation

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Hrishikesh Roy and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish Chandra Sharma

  16. 16-Jul-2024

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 16-Jul-2024

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Hrishikesh Roy and Hon'ble Mr. Justice S.V.N. Bhatti

  18. 10-Apr-2019

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 02-Jan-2019

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 02-Jan-2019

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice S.A. Bobde and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta

  21. 27-Nov-2018

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  22. 27-Nov-2018

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Madan B. Lokur, Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Abdul Nazeer and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta

  23. 11-Oct-2018

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  24. 11-Oct-2018

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Madan B. Lokur and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta

  25. 03-Aug-2018

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  26. 03-Aug-2018

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Madan B. Lokur and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta

  27. 09-Jul-2018

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  28. 09-Jul-2018

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Madan B. Lokur and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta

  29. 04-May-2018

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  30. 04-May-2018

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Madan B. Lokur and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta

  31. 27-Mar-2018

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  32. 27-Mar-2018

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Madan B. Lokur and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta

  33. 22-Feb-2018

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  34. 22-Feb-2018

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Madan B. Lokur, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta

  35. 05-Feb-2018

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  36. 05-Feb-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  37. 10-Feb-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  38. 10-Feb-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  39. 16-Dec-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  40. 16-Dec-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  41. 15-Nov-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  42. 15-Nov-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  43. 11-Nov-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  44. 11-Nov-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  45. 28-Oct-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  46. 28-Oct-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  47. 25-Oct-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  48. 25-Oct-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  49. 21-Oct-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  50. 21-Oct-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  51. 30-Aug-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  52. 30-Aug-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  53. 02-Aug-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  54. 02-Aug-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  55. 06-May-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  56. 25-Apr-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  57. 15-Dec-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  58. 15-Dec-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  59. 27-Nov-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  60. 27-Nov-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  61. 21-Aug-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  62. 21-Aug-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  63. 11-Aug-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  64. 11-Aug-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  65. 12-Feb-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  66. 27-Nov-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  67. 01-Aug-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  68. 16-Jul-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  69. 02-May-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  70. 26-Apr-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  71. 07-Mar-2013

    ROPView PDF

  72. 24-Jan-2013

    ROPView PDF

  73. 12-Dec-2012

    ROPView PDF

  74. 29-Oct-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  75. 19-Sep-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  76. 07-Sep-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  77. 09-Aug-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  78. 24-Jul-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  79. 18-Nov-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  80. 09-Sep-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  81. 05-Jul-2011

    Judgment - of Main CaseView PDF

  82. 05-May-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  83. 04-May-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  84. 21-Apr-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  85. 18-Apr-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  86. 15-Apr-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  87. 06-Apr-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  88. 01-Apr-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  89. 18-Jan-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  90. 07-Jan-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  91. 15-Dec-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  92. 18-Nov-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  93. 28-Oct-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  94. 22-Oct-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  95. 31-Aug-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  96. 12-Aug-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  97. 11-Aug-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  98. 06-May-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  99. 23-Mar-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  100. 18-Feb-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  101. 24-Aug-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  102. 16-Dec-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  103. 19-Sep-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  104. 15-Apr-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  105. 31-Mar-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  106. 05-Dec-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  107. 25-Oct-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  108. 09-May-2007

    Case filed

    Registration No. W.P.(C) No. 250/2007

View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY: Nandini Sundar v. State of Chhattisgarh, W.P.(C) No. 250/2007 On May 15, 2025, the Supreme Court disposed of the writ petitions and contempt petition after finding that the prayers sought had been crystallized in its July 5, 2011 order, which comprehensively addressed concerns about Special Police Officers (SPOs), Salwa Judum vigilante activities, investigations into alleged human rights violations in Chhattisgarh's Naxalite-affected areas, and victim rehabilitation. The Court rejected the contempt petition's claim that Chhattisgarh's 2011 Auxiliary Armed Police Force Act constituted court contempt, holding that legislative enactment cannot be treated as contempt absent a prior declaration of unconstitutionality, as this would violate separation of powers. Since compliance reports had been submitted and the original prayers were already addressed, all pending matters stood disposed with no further orders required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case