B.L.MEHRA . vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN . — C.A. No. 2658/2013

Case under Section XV. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010140292005

Filing Date

11-Jul-2005

Registration No

C.A. No. 2658/2013

Diary Number

14029/2005

Order Date

21-Mar-2013

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Allowed

Last updated 28-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XV

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.B.L.MEHRA .

    Adv. ROHINI MUSA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF RAJASTHAN .

    Adv. PARMANAND GAUR IRSHAD AHMAD MILIND KUMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 21-Mar-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 16-Mar-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 10-Feb-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 03-Jan-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 21-Oct-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 16-Sep-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 12-Aug-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 08-Jul-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 11-Apr-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 13-Dec-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 11-Jan-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 24-Apr-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 17-Oct-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 28-Apr-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 29-Oct-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 17-Apr-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 30-Mar-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 25-Jan-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 17-Oct-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 11-Sep-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  22. 16-Aug-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  23. 11-Jul-2005

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 2658/2013

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: B.L. Mehra v. State of Rajasthan (C.A. No. 002658/2013) The Supreme Court allowed B.L. Mehra's appeal against the 2005 High Court order that dismissed his writ petition challenging the Jaipur Development Authority's permission for private respondents to construct flats on specific plots in Jaipur. The Court found the High Court had improperly decided the batch of matters without independently examining the appellants' case. The matter was remitted to the High Court for fresh disposal, with parties directed to file amended pleadings within four weeks and the High Court requested to decide within nine months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case