COMMR.OF CEN.EXC.-II vs M/S MIRAJ PRODUCTS P.LTD. MANAGING PARTNER — C.A. No. 143 - 147/2010

Case under Indirect Taxation : Central Excise Act, Central Excise Tariff Act Section XVII-A. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010139842009

Filing Date

05-May-2009

Registration No

C.A. No. 143 - 147/2010

Diary Number

13984/2009

Order Date

08-Jul-2024

Document Type

Judgement - of Main Case

Neutral Citation

2024 INSC 470

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 04-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Indirect Taxation : Central Excise Act, Central Excise Tariff Act Section XVII-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.COMMR.OF CEN.EXC.-II

    Adv. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA[P-1]

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M/S MIRAJ PRODUCTS P.LTD. MANAGING PARTNER

    Adv. M. P. DEVANATH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Jul-2024

    Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 08-Jul-2024

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 08-Jul-2024

    After Week/Month/Vacation

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abhay S. Oka and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Augustine George Masih

  5. 09-Nov-2023

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 09-Nov-2023

    After Week/Month/Vacation

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abhay S. Oka and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Mithal

  7. 09-Nov-2023

    After Week/Month/Vacation

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abhay S. Oka and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Mithal

  8. 21-Sep-2023

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 21-Sep-2023

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Ravindra Bhat and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aravind Kumar

  10. 20-Sep-2023

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Ravindra Bhat and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aravind Kumar

  11. 14-Sep-2023

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Ravindra Bhat and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aravind Kumar

  12. 13-Sep-2023

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aravind Kumar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.V. Viswanathan

  13. 31-Aug-2023

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Ravindra Bhat and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aravind Kumar

  14. 24-Aug-2023

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Ravindra Bhat and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aravind Kumar

  15. 23-Aug-2023

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Ravindra Bhat and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aravind Kumar

  16. 17-Aug-2023

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Ravindra Bhat and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aravind Kumar

  17. 16-Aug-2023

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Ravindra Bhat and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aravind Kumar

  18. 10-Aug-2023

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Ravindra Bhat and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aravind Kumar

  19. 09-Aug-2023

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Ravindra Bhat and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aravind Kumar

  20. 03-Aug-2023

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Ravindra Bhat and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aravind Kumar

  21. 02-Aug-2023

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Ravindra Bhat and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aravind Kumar

  22. 20-Jul-2023

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Ravindra Bhat and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aravind Kumar

  23. 19-Apr-2023

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  24. 19-Apr-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  25. 07-Dec-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  26. 30-Oct-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  27. 05-May-2009

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 143 - 147/2010

  28. [ 2024 INSC 470 ]

    Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Supreme Court upheld the Tribunal's decision that Section 4A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 does not apply to M/s Miraj Products Pvt. Ltd.'s chewing tobacco packaging. The court found that although the respondent packed 33 small pouches (6gms each) plus one 15gm pouch together in poly packs with MRP printed, these poly packs were bundled into HDPE bags containing 100 poly packs and sold to distributors—constituting wholesale packages not requiring MRP declaration under packaging rules, thus falling outside Section 4A's scope. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case