J.RADHA KRISHNA vs PAGADALA BHARATHI — C.A. No. 1834/2015
Case under Civil Law : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 and Specific Relief Act, 1963 – Matters Arising Out of Suit for Specific Performance, Declaration, Injunction, Possession or Cancellation of Deeds/documents Section III-A. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010135132013
Filing Date
26-Apr-2013
Registration No
C.A. No. 1834/2015
Diary Number
13513/2013
Order Date
05-Jun-2025
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 07-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.J.RADHA KRISHNA
Adv. VENKATESWARA RAO ANUMOLU[P-1]
Respondent(s)
-
1.PAGADALA BHARATHI
Adv. M. A. CHINNASAMY
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-Jun-2025
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Jun-2025
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish Chandra Sharma
-
04-Jun-2025
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Jun-2025
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish Chandra Sharma
-
25-Mar-2025
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Oct-2024
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Oct-2024
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dipankar Datta and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol
-
05-Sep-2024
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dipankar Datta and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol
-
04-Sep-2024
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dipankar Datta and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol
-
13-Aug-2024
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Aug-2019
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Aug-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Sep-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Sep-2015
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Sep-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Feb-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Feb-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Oct-2014
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Jan-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Oct-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-May-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Apr-2013
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 1834/2015
Summary of C.A. No. 001834/2015 The Supreme Court dismissed appellant J. Radha Krishna's appeal challenging the High Court's judgment favoring respondent Pagadala Bharathi regarding a disputed gift deed. The Court upheld that a 1986 gift deed executed by KVG Murthy in favor of Bharathi created a valid, irrevocable settlement deed, and could not be revoked under Section 126 of the Transfer of Property Act without a reserved right or prior agreement—which evidence did not establish. All pending applications were disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts