SHWETHA GOEL vs NIRAJ GOEL — T.P.(C) No. 43/2009

Case under Section XII-A. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010013502009

Filing Date

14-Jan-2009

Registration No

T.P.(C) No. 43/2009

Diary Number

1350/2009

Order Date

07-Apr-2011

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Disposed Off

Last updated 01-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XII-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHWETHA GOEL

    Adv. PRAMOD DAYAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NIRAJ GOEL

    Adv. SANJAY JAIN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Apr-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 01-Apr-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 03-Dec-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 26-Nov-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 27-Oct-2010
  7. 28-Sep-2010
  8. 13-Aug-2010
  9. 29-Jul-2010
  10. 13-Jul-2010
  11. 06-Apr-2010
  12. 18-Mar-2010
  13. 12-Mar-2010
  14. 08-Feb-2010
  15. 03-Feb-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 01-Feb-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 21-Jan-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 07-Jan-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 04-Dec-2009
  20. 02-Dec-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 22-Oct-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  22. 07-Sep-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  23. 04-Sep-2009
  24. 22-Jul-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  25. 08-Jul-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  26. 14-Jan-2009

    Case filed

    Registration No. T.P.(C) No. 43/2009

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: T.P.(C) No. 000043/2009 – Shwetha Goel v. Niraj Goel On April 7, 2011, the Supreme Court granted mutual consent divorce to Shwetha Goel and Niraj Goel under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, after both parties reached an amicable settlement agreement dated April 6, 2011. The Court dismissed all related proceedings, including 12 civil/criminal cases pending in various courts at Hyderabad, Ghaziabad, and Allahabad, and quashed associated FIRs and complaints filed by the parties and their family members. The Court directed that parties strictly comply with the settlement agreement terms. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case