DILIP vs SYED ABDULLA SYED YASIN . — C.A. No. 2724 - 2725/2015

Case under Section III. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010134142012

Filing Date

17-Apr-2012

Registration No

C.A. No. 2724 - 2725/2015

Diary Number

13414/2012

Order Date

22-Oct-2019

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Disposed Off

Last updated 06-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section III

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DILIP

    Adv. ANKOLEKAR GURUDATTA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SYED ABDULLA SYED YASIN .

    Adv. D. M. NARGOLKAR (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 22-Oct-2019

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 22-Oct-2019

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.M. Joseph

  4. 17-Oct-2019

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.M. Joseph

  5. 16-Oct-2019

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.M. Joseph

  6. 12-Sep-2019

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.M. Joseph

  7. 05-Sep-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 22-Jul-2013
  9. 09-May-2013
  10. 26-Apr-2013
  11. 26-Apr-2013
  12. 18-Apr-2013
  13. 05-Mar-2013
  14. 19-Nov-2012
  15. 24-Aug-2012
  16. 13-Aug-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 01-Aug-2012
  18. 20-Jul-2012
  19. 07-May-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 17-Apr-2012

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 2724 - 2725/2015

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of C.A. No. 002724-002725/2015 (Dilip v. Syed Abdulla Syed Yasin) On October 22, 2019, the Supreme Court disposed of multiple connected civil appeals by directing that they be decided in terms of the October 1, 2019 judgment in C.A. No. 2723/2015 (Dist. Collector Satara v. Mangesh Nivrutti Kashid), with a caveat for C.A. No. 2735-2736/2015 that if inquiries were already completed under 2012 Rules, their results must be declared. For the SLP Nos. 22886-22887/2019, the Court set aside the impugned High Court order and remitted the matter for fresh decision on merits, finding it unrelated to the batch matters. Parties bear their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case