DILIP vs SYED ABDULLA SYED YASIN . — C.A. No. 2724 - 2725/2015
Case under Section III. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010134142012
Filing Date
17-Apr-2012
Registration No
C.A. No. 2724 - 2725/2015
Diary Number
13414/2012
Order Date
22-Oct-2019
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Disposed Off
Last updated 06-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DILIP
Adv. ANKOLEKAR GURUDATTA
Respondent(s)
-
1.SYED ABDULLA SYED YASIN .
Adv. D. M. NARGOLKAR (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
22-Oct-2019
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Oct-2019
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.M. Joseph
-
17-Oct-2019
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.M. Joseph
-
16-Oct-2019
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.M. Joseph
-
12-Sep-2019
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.M. Joseph
-
05-Sep-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Jul-2013
ROPView PDF
-
09-May-2013
ROPView PDF
-
26-Apr-2013
ROPView PDF
-
26-Apr-2013
ROPView PDF
-
18-Apr-2013
ROPView PDF
-
05-Mar-2013
ROPView PDF
-
19-Nov-2012
ROPView PDF
-
24-Aug-2012
ROPView PDF
-
13-Aug-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Aug-2012
ROPView PDF
-
20-Jul-2012
ROPView PDF
-
07-May-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Apr-2012
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 2724 - 2725/2015
Summary of C.A. No. 002724-002725/2015 (Dilip v. Syed Abdulla Syed Yasin) On October 22, 2019, the Supreme Court disposed of multiple connected civil appeals by directing that they be decided in terms of the October 1, 2019 judgment in C.A. No. 2723/2015 (Dist. Collector Satara v. Mangesh Nivrutti Kashid), with a caveat for C.A. No. 2735-2736/2015 that if inquiries were already completed under 2012 Rules, their results must be declared. For the SLP Nos. 22886-22887/2019, the Court set aside the impugned High Court order and remitted the matter for fresh decision on merits, finding it unrelated to the batch matters. Parties bear their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts