GIAN CHAND . vs STATE OF HARYANA . — C.A. No. 6668 - 6669/2013

Case under Section IV. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010132512011

Filing Date

21-Apr-2011

Registration No

C.A. No. 6668 - 6669/2013

Diary Number

13251/2011

Order Date

07-Aug-2013

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Allowed

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section IV

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GIAN CHAND .

    Adv. SHIVA PUJAN SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA .

    Adv. NARESH BAKSHI SUBHASISH BHOWMICK ANUBHA AGRAWAL MOHAN LAL SHARMA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Aug-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 06-Aug-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 09-Jul-2013
  5. 04-Jul-2013
  6. 01-Jul-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 17-Apr-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 13-Feb-2013
  9. 23-Jan-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 04-Dec-2012
  11. 06-Nov-2012
  12. 09-Oct-2012
  13. 19-Jul-2012
  14. 16-Jul-2012
  15. 11-May-2012
  16. 26-Apr-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 26-Apr-2012
  18. 21-Mar-2012
  19. 13-Mar-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 02-Feb-2012
  21. 19-Jan-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  22. 16-Dec-2011
  23. 05-Dec-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  24. 25-Nov-2011
  25. 14-Nov-2011
  26. 01-Nov-2011
  27. 01-Nov-2011
  28. 23-Sep-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  29. 08-Aug-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  30. 25-Jul-2011
  31. 09-May-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  32. 21-Apr-2011

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 6668 - 6669/2013

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Gian Chand v. State of Haryana (C.A. No. 006668-006669/2013) The Supreme Court allowed the appeals and quashed the land acquisition of 483 acres in Pinjore, Haryana for residential sector development. The Court found that the Land Acquisition Collector failed to comply with mandatory Section 5A(2) procedures by mechanically signing pre-filled recommendations without objectively considering landowners' objections. The State Government must follow proper acquisition procedures if it wishes to re-acquire the land, and appellants remain free to raise all objections in future proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case