MD SHAHID ANWAR vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. MINISTRY OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT SECRETARY — W.P.(C) No. 287/2013
Case under Section PIL-W. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010131972013
Filing Date
23-Apr-2013
Registration No
W.P.(C) No. 287/2013
Diary Number
13197/2013
Order Date
07-Jul-2017
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Disposed Off
Last updated 06-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MD SHAHID ANWAR
Adv. SIBO SANKAR MISHRA (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [P-1]
Respondent(s)
-
1.UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. MINISTRY OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT SECRETARY
Adv. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA[R-1] SAMIR ALI KHAN[R-3] GURMEET SINGH MAKKER[R-2]
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Jul-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Jul-2017
Not Taken Up
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jagdish Singh Khehar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud
-
20-Mar-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Mar-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Mar-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Mar-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Jan-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Jan-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Dec-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Dec-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Aug-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Aug-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Jan-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Jan-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Nov-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Nov-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Sep-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Sep-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Apr-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Apr-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Jan-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Apr-2013
Case filed
Registration No. W.P.(C) No. 287/2013
Case Summary: W.P.(C) No. 287/2013 - MD Shahid Anwar v. Union of India Outcome: The Supreme Court dismissed the writ petition on July 7, 2017, finding no justification to retain it. The petition challenged CAG findings of financial lapses in Bihar's Indira Awas Yojana expenditures. The Additional Solicitor General clarified that the CAG report was properly deliberated by the Accounts Committee, state explanations were sought and considered, and all necessary formalities were complied with. The court found the petitioner's concerns already addressed through established constitutional procedures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts