THE STATE OF DELHI UNION OF INDIA AND ORS SECRETARY vs RAM DUTT SHARMA — C.A. No. 3224/2006
Case under Section XV. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010130402005
Filing Date
05-Jul-2005
Registration No
C.A. No. 3224/2006
Diary Number
13040/2005
Order Date
05-Oct-2017
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Disposed Off
Last updated 27-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF DELHI UNION OF INDIA AND ORS SECRETARY
Adv. ANIL KATIYAR[P-1] ANIL KATIYAR[P-2] ANIL KATIYAR[P-3]
Respondent(s)
-
1.RAM DUTT SHARMA
Adv. PRASHANT CHAUDHARY
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-Oct-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Oct-2017
Ordinary
Hon'ble The Chief Justice, Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud
-
04-May-2017
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-May-2017
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-May-2017
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Apr-2017
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Apr-2017
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Apr-2017
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Apr-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Apr-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Apr-2017
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Apr-2017
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Apr-2017
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Feb-2017
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Feb-2017
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Feb-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Feb-2017
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Feb-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Jan-2017
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Jan-2017
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Dec-2016
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Dec-2016
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
31-Jul-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Jul-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Aug-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Aug-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Jul-2005
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 3224/2006
Case Summary: C.A. No. 003224/2006 The Supreme Court disposed of the Union of India's appeal against High Court directions requiring Indian Railways to provide medical assistance to passengers. The Court affirmed most prior directions and added new mandates: Railways must maintain oxygen cylinders on trains, staff must notify next stations of medical emergencies, and Railways must consult AIIMS experts on further improvements, with implementation reports filed with the Court. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts