LT. COL. TAPAN CHATOPADHYAY vs UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF DEFENCE SECRETARY — C.A. No. 4848/2011

Case under Section XVII. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010129332011

Filing Date

19-Apr-2011

Registration No

C.A. No. 4848/2011

Diary Number

12933/2011

Order Date

27-Jun-2018

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XVII

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.LT. COL. TAPAN CHATOPADHYAY

    Adv. PRAKASH KUMAR SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF DEFENCE SECRETARY

    Adv. B. V. BALARAM DAS (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-Jun-2018

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 27-Jun-2018

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arun Mishra and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul

  4. 27-Jun-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 27-Jun-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 23-Jun-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 23-Jun-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 01-Feb-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 01-Feb-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 03-Dec-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 03-Dec-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 02-Apr-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 05-Feb-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 10-Dec-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 23-Nov-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 05-Oct-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 05-Sep-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 11-Jul-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 07-Jul-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 19-Apr-2011

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 4848/2011

casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY: Lt. Col. Tapan Chattopadhyay's civil appeal against the Union of India was heard by the Supreme Court bench comprising Justice Arun Mishra and Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul on June 27, 2018. The Court found no grounds to interfere with the Armed Forces Tribunal's earlier order and dismissed the appeal. Any pending applications were also disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case