THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE vs M/S. GRASIM INDUSTRIES LTD. THROUGH MANAGER — C.A. No. 7272/2005

Case under Indirect Taxation : Central Excise Act, Central Excise Tariff Act Section XVII-A. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010012932005

Filing Date

15-Jan-2005

Registration No

C.A. No. 7272/2005

Diary Number

1293/2005

Order Date

20-Sep-2024

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Neutral Citation

2018 INSC 500

Disposal Type

Disposed Off

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Indirect Taxation : Central Excise Act, Central Excise Tariff Act Section XVII-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE

    Adv. B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M/S. GRASIM INDUSTRIES LTD. THROUGH MANAGER

    Adv. M. P. DEVANATH[R-1]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-Sep-2024

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 20-Sep-2024

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice, Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Misra

  4. 02-Aug-2024

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 02-Aug-2024

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice, Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Misra

  6. 29-Jul-2024

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 29-Jul-2024

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice, Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Misra

  8. 11-May-2018

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Gogoi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice N.V. Ramana, Hon'ble Mrs. Justice R. Banumathi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohan M. Shantanagoudar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Abdul Nazeer

  9. 21-Feb-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 23-Jul-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 23-Jul-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 22-Jul-2015

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 15-Jan-2005

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 7272/2005

  14. [ 2018 INSC 500 ]

    Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. PDF 8View PDF

  16. PDF 9View PDF

  17. PDF 10View PDF

  18. PDF 11View PDF

  19. PDF 12View PDF

  20. PDF 13View PDF

  21. PDF 14View PDF

  22. PDF 15View PDF

  23. PDF 16View PDF

  24. PDF 17View PDF

  25. PDF 18View PDF

  26. PDF 19View PDF

  27. PDF 20View PDF

  28. PDF 21View PDF

  29. PDF 22View PDF

  30. PDF 23View PDF

  31. PDF 24View PDF

  32. PDF 25View PDF

  33. PDF 26View PDF

  34. PDF 27View PDF

  35. PDF 28View PDF

  36. PDF 29View PDF

  37. PDF 30View PDF

  38. PDF 31View PDF

  39. PDF 32View PDF

  40. PDF 33View PDF

  41. PDF 34View PDF

  42. PDF 35View PDF

  43. PDF 36View PDF

  44. PDF 37View PDF

  45. PDF 38View PDF

  46. PDF 39View PDF

  47. PDF 40View PDF

  48. PDF 41View PDF

  49. PDF 42View PDF

  50. PDF 43View PDF

  51. PDF 44View PDF

  52. PDF 45View PDF

  53. PDF 46View PDF

  54. PDF 47View PDF

  55. PDF 48View PDF

  56. PDF 49View PDF

  57. PDF 50View PDF

  58. PDF 51View PDF

  59. PDF 52View PDF

  60. PDF 53View PDF

  61. PDF 54View PDF

  62. PDF 55View PDF

  63. PDF 56View PDF

  64. PDF 57View PDF

  65. PDF 58View PDF

  66. PDF 59View PDF

  67. PDF 60View PDF

  68. PDF 61View PDF

  69. PDF 62View PDF

  70. PDF 63View PDF

  71. PDF 64View PDF

  72. PDF 65View PDF

  73. PDF 66View PDF

  74. PDF 67View PDF

  75. PDF 68View PDF

  76. PDF 69View PDF

  77. PDF 70View PDF

  78. PDF 71View PDF

  79. PDF 72View PDF

  80. PDF 73View PDF

  81. PDF 74View PDF

  82. PDF 75View PDF

  83. PDF 76View PDF

  84. PDF 77View PDF

  85. PDF 78View PDF

  86. PDF 79View PDF

  87. PDF 80View PDF

Common Record of Proceedings — heard with connected matters

Lead case: SLP(Crl) No. 588/2005

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of C.A. No. 007272/2005 The Commissioner of Central Excise v. M/s. Grasim Industries Ltd. On September 20, 2024, the Supreme Court disposed of Civil Appeal No. 7272/2005 and 139 related appeals/petitions involving central excise tax disputes. The Court noted that the monetary threshold for Supreme Court appeals had been increased from ₹2 crores to ₹5 crores, and confirmed the tax effect in these matters fell below the new threshold. All appeals and special leave petitions were disposed of accordingly, with legal questions left open for future consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case