GOPAL vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH HOME DEPARTMENT STATION HOUSE OFFICER — Crl.A. No. 361/2013
Case under 1511Li-criminal Law : Criminal Matters Other Than Covered by the Aforesaid Categories(cases Where Life Sentence Is Imposed) Section II-E. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010122942012
Filing Date
09-Apr-2012
Registration No
Crl.A. No. 361/2013
Diary Number
12294/2012
Order Date
30-Jul-2025
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Partly Allowed
Last updated 06-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GOPAL
Adv. PRATIBHA JAIN[P-1]
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH HOME DEPARTMENT STATION HOUSE OFFICER
Adv. PASHUPATHI NATH RAZDAN[R-1]
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Jul-2025
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Jul-2025
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.M. Sundresh and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh
-
13-Nov-2024
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.M. Sundresh and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aravind Kumar
-
07-Nov-2024
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Nov-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Oct-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Oct-2015
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Oct-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Sep-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Sep-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Feb-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Feb-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Dec-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Apr-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Apr-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Feb-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Feb-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Jan-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Nov-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Sep-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Jul-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Jul-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Apr-2012
Case filed
Registration No. Crl.A. No. 361/2013
Summary of Crl.A. No. 361/2013 - Gopal v. State of Madhya Pradesh The Supreme Court partly allowed the appeal on 30.07.2025, modifying the appellants' conviction from murder (Section 302/149 IPC) to causing death by negligence (Section 304 Part-I IPC). The incident arose from a property dispute; the appellants had legally purchased the property from Pyaribai, and the opposite party's civil suit for possession was dismissed. The Court found the lower courts failed to properly consider the circumstances and ruled the occurrence constituted culpable homicide not amounting to murder. The sentence was modified to the time already served (7+ years), with all pending applications disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts