S.CHANDRAMOHAN vs STATE REP. BY ITS SECRETARY — C.A. No. 2133/2012
Case under Section XII-B. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010122412011
Filing Date
15-Apr-2011
Registration No
C.A. No. 2133/2012
Diary Number
12241/2011
Order Date
16-Aug-2023
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 04-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.S.CHANDRAMOHAN
Adv. SENTHIL JAGADEESAN (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [P-1]
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE REP. BY ITS SECRETARY
Adv. PURNIMA KRISHNA[R-1]
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Aug-2023
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Aug-2023
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Hima Kohli and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal
-
10-Aug-2023
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Aug-2023
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Hima Kohli and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal
-
09-Aug-2023
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Hima Kohli and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal
-
27-Jul-2023
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Jul-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Jul-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Jul-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Feb-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Dec-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Sep-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Jul-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-May-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Apr-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Apr-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Apr-2011
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 2133/2012
Case Summary: C.A. No. 002133/2012 S. Chandramohan v. State Represented by its Secretary & Anr. S. Chandramohan, appointed as a Typist at Life Insurance Corporation in 1984 under the Scheduled Tribes quota, challenged the dismissal of his plea regarding community certificate verification. A three-member Scrutiny Committee rejected his claim of belonging to the "Konda Reddi" tribal community, finding he actually belonged to the "Reddiyar" forward community, citing missing original school records and suspicious certificates. The Supreme Court dismissed his appeal on 16 August 2023, upholding the High Court's judgment, finding the Committee's rejection was based on comprehensive documentary evidence and proper procedures, not just anthropological findings. The Court allowed him to approach LIC for any post-dismissal benefits he may be entitled to in law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts