S.CHANDRAMOHAN vs STATE REP. BY ITS SECRETARY — C.A. No. 2133/2012

Case under Section XII-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010122412011

Filing Date

15-Apr-2011

Registration No

C.A. No. 2133/2012

Diary Number

12241/2011

Order Date

16-Aug-2023

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 04-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XII-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.S.CHANDRAMOHAN

    Adv. SENTHIL JAGADEESAN (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [P-1]

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE REP. BY ITS SECRETARY

    Adv. PURNIMA KRISHNA[R-1]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Aug-2023

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 16-Aug-2023

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Hima Kohli and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal

  4. 10-Aug-2023

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 10-Aug-2023

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Hima Kohli and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal

  6. 09-Aug-2023

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Hima Kohli and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal

  7. 27-Jul-2023

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 27-Jul-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 08-Jul-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 08-Jul-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 10-Feb-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 07-Dec-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 12-Sep-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 11-Jul-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 13-May-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 25-Apr-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 20-Apr-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 15-Apr-2011

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 2133/2012

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C.A. No. 002133/2012 S. Chandramohan v. State Represented by its Secretary & Anr. S. Chandramohan, appointed as a Typist at Life Insurance Corporation in 1984 under the Scheduled Tribes quota, challenged the dismissal of his plea regarding community certificate verification. A three-member Scrutiny Committee rejected his claim of belonging to the "Konda Reddi" tribal community, finding he actually belonged to the "Reddiyar" forward community, citing missing original school records and suspicious certificates. The Supreme Court dismissed his appeal on 16 August 2023, upholding the High Court's judgment, finding the Committee's rejection was based on comprehensive documentary evidence and proper procedures, not just anthropological findings. The Court allowed him to approach LIC for any post-dismissal benefits he may be entitled to in law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case