TAMILNADU JAI BHARATH MILLS LTD. vs HONGKONG & SHANGHAI BANKING CORPN. LTD. — C.A. No. 4931/2004
Case under Section I-B. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010121312000
Filing Date
24-Jul-2000
Registration No
C.A. No. 4931/2004
Diary Number
12131/2000
Order Date
07-May-2008
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Allowed
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.TAMILNADU JAI BHARATH MILLS LTD.
Adv. A. V. RANGAM (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Respondent(s)
-
1.HONGKONG & SHANGHAI BANKING CORPN. LTD.
Adv. K. K. MANI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-May-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-May-2008
Judgment - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Apr-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Mar-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Dec-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Jul-2004
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Jan-2004
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Dec-2003
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Jul-2003
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-May-2003
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Mar-2003
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Feb-2003
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Jul-2000
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 4931/2004
Case Summary: Tamil Nadu Jai Bharath Mills Ltd. v. Hongkong & Shanghai Banking Corporation Ltd. Outcome: The Supreme Court allowed all appeals (CA 4931/2004, 4938/2004, 4939/2004, 4940/2004, 4932-4933/2004, and 4934-4937/2004) and set aside the impugned orders. The complaints were dismissed, finding that complainants should have filed properly constituted civil suits in competent civil courts rather than pursuing consumer forum complaints. Direction: The complainants were granted liberty to file civil suits. Crucially, the Court directed that if Section 14 Limitation Act petitions are filed with the plaints, the time spent from the date of filing the original complaints until May 7, 2008 shall be excluded from the limitation period, recognizing the complainants' bona fide prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts