BHOSALE AKASH GAJANAN vs UNION OF INDIA — C.A. No. 4605 - 4607/2026

Case under Armed Forces and Paramilitary Forces : Slps and Writ Petitions Pertaining to Armed Forces and Paramilitary Forces, Including Recruitment/ Appointment, Court Martial, Disciplinary Action, Pension, Emoluments, Salary and Other Incidental Matters Section XIV-A. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010121052026

Filing Date

24-Feb-2026

Registration No

C.A. No. 4605 - 4607/2026

Diary Number

12105/2026

Order Date

15-Apr-2026

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Leave Granted & Disposed off

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Armed Forces and ParaMilitary Forces : SLPs and Writ Petitions pertaining to armed forces and paramilitary forces, including recruitment/ appointment, court martial, disciplinary action, pension, emoluments, salary and other incidental matters Section XIV-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BHOSALE AKASH GAJANAN

    Adv. SHAHRUKH AHMAD

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA

    Adv. ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA[R-1] ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA[R-2] ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA[R-3] ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA[R-4]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dipankar Datta and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish Chandra Sharma

  4. 06-Apr-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 06-Apr-2026

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dipankar Datta and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish Chandra Sharma

  6. 01-Apr-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 01-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 24-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 4605 - 4607/2026

View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal of Bhosale Akash Gajanan after AIIMS medical examination found him medically fit for appointment in the Central Industrial Security Force (CISF), while dismissing the appeals of the other two appellants who were found to have vision defects. The Court directed appellant no.1 to present himself before CISF within a fortnight with a copy of the order for appointment/enrollment, and granted him notional seniority from his batch's appointment date (though without back wages) to compensate for the delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case