MADHAV vs ASHWINI — C.A. No. 4909/2014

Case under Section XII-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010119962012

Filing Date

07-Apr-2012

Registration No

C.A. No. 4909/2014

Diary Number

11996/2012

Order Date

25-Apr-2014

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Allowed

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XII-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MADHAV

    Adv. SHAILESH MADIYAL (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ASHWINI

    Adv. A. SUMATHI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Apr-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 17-Apr-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 28-Mar-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 07-Mar-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 04-Mar-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 24-Jan-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 06-Dec-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 25-Oct-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 06-Sep-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 05-Jul-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 12-Apr-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 17-Sep-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 04-Jul-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 07-Apr-2012

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 4909/2014

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Madhav v. Ashwini (C.A. No. 004909/2014) On 25 April 2014, the Supreme Court allowed Madhav's appeal and set aside the High Court's November 2011 order that had quashed his divorce decree. The parties settled their dispute with a comprehensive mutual settlement: Madhav must pay Rs. 8,00,000 in installments, execute a gift deed for ancestral property (20 guntas) to their daughter Chinmayee, and provide a fixed deposit of Rs. 4,50,000 for her education. Their daughter remains with Ashwini until age 18, with Madhav entitled to twice-monthly visitation rights. The parties must file a mutual consent divorce petition under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act within two weeks, with the second motion filed after six months. The Court directed parties to act upon the settlement terms immediately. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case