PANKAJ KUMAR DAS vs SANJIB KR. CHUTIA — C.A. No. 15600/2017

Case under Section XIV-A. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010117782013

Filing Date

10-Apr-2013

Registration No

C.A. No. 15600/2017

Diary Number

11778/2013

Order Date

04-Oct-2017

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Leave Granted & Disposed off

Last updated 06-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XIV-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PANKAJ KUMAR DAS

    Adv. RAHUL PRATAP[P-1]

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SANJIB KR. CHUTIA

    Adv. VIKASH SINGH[R-24] DEBOJIT BORKAKATI[R-3] DEBOJIT BORKAKATI[R-4] DEBOJIT BORKAKATI[R-5] DEBOJIT BORKAKATI[R-20] DEBOJIT BORKAKATI[R-21]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-Oct-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 04-Oct-2017

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Gogoi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abhay Manohar Sapre and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Navin Sinha

  4. 21-Sep-2017

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Navin Sinha

  5. 16-Aug-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 16-Aug-2017

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Navin Sinha

  7. 04-Jul-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 04-Jul-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 10-Apr-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 10-Apr-2017

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 10-Apr-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 03-Mar-2017
  13. 03-Mar-2017
  14. 07-Feb-2017
  15. 07-Feb-2017

    Office ReportView PDF

  16. 07-Feb-2017
  17. 27-Jan-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 27-Jan-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 06-Jan-2017
  20. 06-Jan-2017

    Office ReportView PDF

  21. 06-Jan-2017
  22. 07-Dec-2016
  23. 07-Dec-2016

    Office ReportView PDF

  24. 07-Dec-2016
  25. 06-Oct-2016
  26. 06-Oct-2016

    Office ReportView PDF

  27. 06-Oct-2016
  28. 07-Sep-2016
  29. 07-Sep-2016

    Office ReportView PDF

  30. 07-Sep-2016
  31. 04-Jul-2016
  32. 04-Jul-2016

    Office ReportView PDF

  33. 04-Jul-2016
  34. 15-Mar-2016
  35. 15-Mar-2016

    Office ReportView PDF

  36. 15-Mar-2016
  37. 15-Mar-2016
  38. 15-Mar-2016
  39. 12-Feb-2016
  40. 12-Feb-2016

    Office ReportView PDF

  41. 12-Feb-2016
  42. 27-Nov-2015
  43. 27-Nov-2015
  44. 14-Oct-2015
  45. 14-Oct-2015
  46. 13-Aug-2015
  47. 13-Aug-2015
  48. 08-May-2015
  49. 08-May-2015

    Office ReportView PDF

  50. 08-May-2015
  51. 27-Feb-2015
  52. 27-Feb-2015
  53. 19-Jan-2015
  54. 19-Jan-2015

    Office ReportView PDF

  55. 29-Oct-2014
  56. 29-Oct-2014

    Office ReportView PDF

  57. 25-Jul-2014

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  58. 25-Jul-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  59. 16-Apr-2014

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  60. 16-Apr-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  61. 18-Feb-2014

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  62. 18-Feb-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  63. 03-Jan-2014

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  64. 03-Jan-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  65. 20-Nov-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  66. 04-Oct-2013

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  67. 04-Oct-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  68. 06-Sep-2013

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  69. 06-Sep-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  70. 05-Sep-2013

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  71. 29-Jul-2013
  72. 12-Jul-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  73. 09-May-2013
  74. 26-Apr-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  75. 10-Apr-2013

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 15600/2017

casestatus.in Summary

The Supreme Court granted leave and allowed nine appellants (merit list positions 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17) to continue in service, having served 9-11 years. Considering the long service period and equitable circumstances, the Court declined to address the legal questions on merit, keeping them open for future cases, while suspending effect of the High Court's order in these peculiar facts. The State Government retained discretion to implement the Court's August 16, 2017 order regarding Serial No. 12 candidate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case