COMMISSIONER OF TRADE TAX U.P. vs S/S SHAKTI TUBES — C.A. No. 8884/2015

Case under Indirect Taxation : Value Added Tax (Vat), State Sales Tax Act Section III-A. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010114292012

Filing Date

02-Apr-2012

Registration No

C.A. No. 8884/2015

Diary Number

11429/2012

Order Date

13-Aug-2025

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Indirect Taxation : Value Added Tax (VAT), State Sales Tax Act Section III-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.COMMISSIONER OF TRADE TAX U.P.

    Adv. BHAKTI VARDHAN SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.S/S SHAKTI TUBES

    Adv. T. MAHIPAL[R-1]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Aug-2025

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 13-Aug-2025

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Hon'ble Mr. Justice R. Mahadevan

  4. 07-Aug-2025

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Hon'ble Mr. Justice R. Mahadevan

  5. 06-Aug-2025

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Hon'ble Mr. Justice R. Mahadevan

  6. 31-Jul-2025

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Hon'ble Mr. Justice R. Mahadevan

  7. 30-Jul-2025

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Hon'ble Mr. Justice R. Mahadevan

  8. 24-Jul-2025

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Hon'ble Mr. Justice R. Mahadevan

  9. 23-Jul-2025

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Hon'ble Mr. Justice R. Mahadevan

  10. 22-May-2025

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Hon'ble Mr. Justice R. Mahadevan

  11. 15-May-2025

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Hon'ble Mr. Justice R. Mahadevan

  12. 08-May-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  13. 28-Feb-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 28-Feb-2017

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 28-Feb-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 19-Jan-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 19-Jan-2017

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 19-Jan-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 05-Dec-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 05-Dec-2016

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 05-Dec-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  22. 09-Oct-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  23. 09-Oct-2015

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  24. 09-Oct-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  25. 14-Sep-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  26. 14-Sep-2015

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  27. 14-Sep-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  28. 09-Jul-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  29. 09-Jul-2015

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  30. 09-Jul-2015

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  31. 09-Jul-2015

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  32. 09-Jul-2015

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  33. 09-Jul-2015

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  34. 09-Jul-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  35. 30-Mar-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  36. 09-Feb-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  37. 09-Feb-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  38. 13-Oct-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  39. 13-Oct-2014

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  40. 13-Oct-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  41. 01-Aug-2014

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  42. 01-Aug-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  43. 09-Apr-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  44. 02-Sep-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  45. 29-Nov-2012

    ROPView PDF

  46. 07-Nov-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  47. 02-Apr-2012

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 8884/2015

View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C.A. No. 008884/2015 On 13th August 2025, the Supreme Court (Justices J.B. Pardiwala and R. Mahadevan) heard the revenue appeal filed by the Commissioner of Trade Tax U.P. against S/S Shakti Tubes. The Court disposed of both Civil Appeals 8884/2015 and 8892/2015 on the ground of low tax effect, finding the disputed tax amount to be insignificant. All pending applications were also disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case